VIEW SELECTED MEDIA
Name of Media:
Publisher or Source:
Type of Media:
If Media is a PDF or Document, Such as an Article or Chart, Click Icon:
If Media is a Video, Click Icon:
Long-Term Outcomes after Critical Illness. The Best Predictor of the Future Is the Past
Brian H. Cuthbertson, and Hannah Wunsch
American Thoracic Society
Media Originally for:
Critical Care Physicians, General Public
or many years, we believed that a good outcome for critically ill patients was for them to leave the intensive care unit (ICU) alive. Sadly, we now know from substantial research, including in-depth follow-up of individual patients, that this is not the case.
Many cohort studies of critically ill patients that prospectively followed people after hospital discharge raised concerns regarding long-term outcomes (1–4). Despite the importance of this work, such prospective cohort studies are limited in the type and amount of information they can provide because of small sample size or number of outcome events, uncertain generalizability, and a lack of information on prehospital trajectories. Perhaps most important, many of these exploratory studies lacked comparison with appropriate controls. Therefore, the burden of morbidity and mortality after critical illness was quantified, but with uncertainty regarding the level of attribution to the critical illness and its associated treatments and the contribution of either underlying comorbidity or hospitalization of any kind. In effect, these studies identified that “we have a problem,” but their limitations did not allow us to more fully understand the severity, duration, causation, and trajectory of these problems from the perspectives of our patients and our health systems.
PostICU, Inc's library staff reviewed this copyrighted material contained in the library and reasonably believes that its inclusion in our library complies with the "Fair Use Doctrine" because: (1) our library's is for nonprofit and educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work is related to our mission; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole is fair and reasonable; and (4) the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work will if impacted, should be enhanced, by its presence in our library.